- Welcome to Aryan Guard.
Posted by Celtic_Canadian
- Dec 23, 2025, 12:20 AMQuote from: Shield Maiden on Dec 22, 2025, 10:59 AMHowever, we don't actually want to be seen as supremacists. Because we want to live so far from non whites that they can't see us to witness superiority or mediocrity. We want them out of sight and not burdening us with their presence in our lives and culture. If we lived separately, we would just be proud white people. Instead, we are called supremacists and the media pushes it hard to try and bury the truth of our vast independence and achievements.
And I cannot believe Canada has become so upside down. White people just eat themselves in the name of not being mean. I'll have to be mean enough for us all I guess.
I refer to myself a racial separatist before most things, now-a-days. Canada has really fallen as a country and it is going to take a big push to win things back, the future is going to be very interesting for us White Canadians to say the very least.
Posted by Shield Maiden
- Dec 22, 2025, 10:59 AMQuote from: Jotunn on Dec 18, 2025, 06:57 AMWe ARE pro-White.
We ARE White nationalists
We ARE NOT White supremacists.
We ARE NOT racists.
I've been thinking about this a lot. The idea that we're supremacists only exists because we're forced to live with a lot of non whites. The fact that our outshining them is tangible and creates resentment towards us keeps the word 'supremacy' in their little minds. That we don't have any inclination to invite them into our goings on fuels that fire. The fact that we don't need them or anything they invent or produce. The word supremacist is a temper tantrum because we function best without them.
However, we don't actually want to be seen as supremacists. Because we want to live so far from non whites that they can't see us to witness superiority or mediocrity. We want them out of sight and not burdening us with their presence in our lives and culture. If we lived separately, we would just be proud white people. Instead, we are called supremacists and the media pushes it hard to try and bury the truth of our vast independence and achievements.
And I cannot believe Canada has become so upside down. White people just eat themselves in the name of not being mean. I'll have to be mean enough for us all I guess.
Posted by Jotunn
- Dec 18, 2025, 07:16 AM"Antifa" are well-known anti-White terrorists who love whitewashing themselves as being "merely concerned citizens" rather than the rabid anti-White Marxist fanatics they can easily be exposed as.
"Antifa just means anti-fascist, if you oppose us, you're a fascist!" they squeal.
That mantra is easily given the lie as they proceed to assault and persecute non-fascists of all sorts. Republicans, Conservatives, Christians, National-Socialists... in fact... anyone who either happens to oppose Marxism, or anyone seen by Marxists as an obstacle or an inconvenience.
Fascism, a form of government practiced in Italy during the early Twentieth century, is symbolized by the fasces, an axe which, instead of having a single wooden handle, has a bundle of sticks bound together to form its handle. Inasmuch as the finished product looks unwieldy, its symbolism is fairly evident: a single stick would be relatively frail. Several bound together, however, gives strength; the axe head demonstrates that with the strength found through unity, the sticks now have the means of defence and security. "Fascism" my this be interpreted simply as: "strength through unity".
So, when the "antifa" insist that their name simply means "opposition to fascism", it means they seek to eliminate the strength found in unity. They want to see people weakened, divided, and easy to prey upon.
That being observed, I myself am no Fascist; National-Socialism is my ideology of choice. While Fascism is essentially a right-wing ideology, National-Socialism limits itself to no wing, incorporating elements of both left and right.
But, "antifa" will no doubt label me a fascist, because that's what they do.
And what I find really interesting is that many common "average Joe" White men and women of no particular political affiliation, Canadians who vote perhaps for the Conservative Party or perhaps even the Liberal Party, people who think I'm evil because the TV and the radio and the newspaper told them to think I'm evil, people who think of themselves as anti-racist and all around nice people... are also technically "fascists" because they aren't rabid enough at expressing their "anti-racist" position, and/or because they're White and thus "benefiting" from "White privilege", and/or because they're Christian and don't realize that makes them "bigots"... these "average Joes" might be sitting at the table thinking "Wow! Look at that neo-Nazi White supremacist, I hope he goes to prison!" or "Aw, look at those 'antifa' heroes, out to protect minorities!" ... and they don't realize that they themselves are also "fascists" slated for elimination by the Marxists they naively praise.
"Antifa just means anti-fascist, if you oppose us, you're a fascist!" they squeal.
That mantra is easily given the lie as they proceed to assault and persecute non-fascists of all sorts. Republicans, Conservatives, Christians, National-Socialists... in fact... anyone who either happens to oppose Marxism, or anyone seen by Marxists as an obstacle or an inconvenience.
Fascism, a form of government practiced in Italy during the early Twentieth century, is symbolized by the fasces, an axe which, instead of having a single wooden handle, has a bundle of sticks bound together to form its handle. Inasmuch as the finished product looks unwieldy, its symbolism is fairly evident: a single stick would be relatively frail. Several bound together, however, gives strength; the axe head demonstrates that with the strength found through unity, the sticks now have the means of defence and security. "Fascism" my this be interpreted simply as: "strength through unity".
So, when the "antifa" insist that their name simply means "opposition to fascism", it means they seek to eliminate the strength found in unity. They want to see people weakened, divided, and easy to prey upon.
That being observed, I myself am no Fascist; National-Socialism is my ideology of choice. While Fascism is essentially a right-wing ideology, National-Socialism limits itself to no wing, incorporating elements of both left and right.
But, "antifa" will no doubt label me a fascist, because that's what they do.
And what I find really interesting is that many common "average Joe" White men and women of no particular political affiliation, Canadians who vote perhaps for the Conservative Party or perhaps even the Liberal Party, people who think I'm evil because the TV and the radio and the newspaper told them to think I'm evil, people who think of themselves as anti-racist and all around nice people... are also technically "fascists" because they aren't rabid enough at expressing their "anti-racist" position, and/or because they're White and thus "benefiting" from "White privilege", and/or because they're Christian and don't realize that makes them "bigots"... these "average Joes" might be sitting at the table thinking "Wow! Look at that neo-Nazi White supremacist, I hope he goes to prison!" or "Aw, look at those 'antifa' heroes, out to protect minorities!" ... and they don't realize that they themselves are also "fascists" slated for elimination by the Marxists they naively praise.
Posted by Jotunn
- Dec 18, 2025, 06:57 AM"Political correctness" is the practice of saying what's "polite" in place of what's factually correct. If one does such a thing of their own free will, it might be argued that they are simply being diplomatic. However, "political correctness" has been shoved down people's throats for some time now. It has long departed the province of being an individual's willful endeavour to be polite, and entered the territory of being the compulsory demand of overarching tyranny.
Perhaps the most egregious example of that is enshrined in the recently modified "hate speech" laws of Canada, where "holocaust denial" has been declared a form of "anti-semitism", and made punishable by imprisonment:
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-319.html
The implications of this are staggering. It is a law that demands Canadian citizens must lie. Any one of us who does not believe in the "holocaust" is forbidden from expressing our honest belief on the matter. And it is considered hateful towards jews if one fails to lie regarding the matter.
However, Canada is a country which expresses no interest in equality, so no such comparable laws are set forth to protect Whites from anti-White sentiment. If anyone utters praise for anything good Whites have done for the country or the world at large, they are likely to be met with protests of "White privilege", "colonialism", "non-White people did it first and/or did it better", "Whites deserve no such praise", etc., etc. Condoning, denying or downplaying of White genocide is not condemned as anti-Aryan, and it is not punishable by law in Canada to refer to it as a "conspiracy theory".
On the contrary, government organs of propaganda such as the CBC are in fact doubling down on promoting hatred of Whites. One of the latest trends is for them to enshrine the denial of human racial differences by referring to all non-Whites as "racialized people", and to spell White in only lower-case letters to strengthen the suggestion that it does not signify a race of people, but merely the colour of skin.
The language of propaganda is rife with euphemisms for atrocity, and dysphemisms for positive things. Genocide is whitewashed as "multiculturalism", "decolonization", "immigration", etc.; and White heritage or self-interest is called "supremacy", "prejudice", "bigotry", etc.
The propaganda of genocide is political correctness on steroids. White people are being talked to their extinction, and pressured into talking ourselves into our own extinction.
In this thread, I'd like to present a few terms and whether they are factually appropriate for the use to which we often see them put.
White nationalists are frequently referred to as "White supremacists" by the mainstream media. The term "supremacy" means "the state or condition of being superior to all others in authority, power, or status". The obvious implication of this is they wish ti indict us in the public mind as being suffused with hubris and arrogant pride, as seeing ourselves as inherently better than everyone else.
The fact is that it is healthy and right for ANYONE of ANY race to look upon their own people as being "the best". It has nothing to do with disrespecting or putting down others, and everything to do with being loyal to the life-force to which you owe your very existence. It is comparable to rooting for one's hometown sports team. "Our team is the best!" You don't stop cheering them because some other team from three towns over beat them in this year's playoffs. You continue calling them "the best" because - they're YOUR team. Right or wrong, weak or strong, in good times or bad; you remain faithful to your own.
It is healthy and right for Whites to be so supportive of their race, just as it is right and healthy for the members of every other race to be similarly supportive of their own races. Yet Whites are invariably persecuted for expressing pro-White sentiment, even as members of non-White races are encouraged to celebrate their own cultures and heritage. This anti-White rhetoric is couched in deeply contrived language calculated to make it seem good and right to condemn Whites. The term "supremacist" is one such example, a term calculated to make us seem inherently prejudiced against others if we so much as dare to utter a passing word of praise for anything good our people have done.
Here's another interesting word: "racist". I'll bet you've heard it before!
It just so happens I called myself a "racist" for several years after becoming racially aware. But at some point, I began to develop a certain caution regarding ALL words I use. The caution of being sure to know exactly what a given word means.
Why did I call myself racist? Because I acknowledged the realities of human racial differences, and because I was aware of the pertinence that those racial differences bear in the world. Essentially, I was using the term "racist" to mean "racially aware".
But - surprise! - that's not what the term actually means.
Let's take a look:
Delving deeper, from the above definition - "prejudice":
That's a lot of baggage packed into that one little word, "racist".
And the fact is that while I am very much racially aware, upon examining the literal meaning of the word "racist", I find that the word simply does not apply to me. I am not "prejudiced"; my racial views are based upon actual experience; I am not driven by dislike nor inclined towards hostility; I am the opposite of unjust in all my endeavours; my opinions are not unfounded. And all this focus on antagonism against others, when I am motivated by a love for my own people and a desire to see them do well?
There's no two ways about it - the term "racist" is completely inappropriate for use upon myself or any serious White nationalist.
And that is a step away from "political correctness" towards literal, factual correctness.
What I am, and for those who would permit me to speak on their behalf, what we are...
We ARE pro-White.
We ARE White nationalists
We ARE NOT White supremacists.
We ARE NOT racists.
These are just a few small examples; I'll be adding more to this thread.
Perhaps the most egregious example of that is enshrined in the recently modified "hate speech" laws of Canada, where "holocaust denial" has been declared a form of "anti-semitism", and made punishable by imprisonment:
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-319.html
QuoteEveryone who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes antisemitism by condoning, denying or downplaying the Holocaust... is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or... is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
The implications of this are staggering. It is a law that demands Canadian citizens must lie. Any one of us who does not believe in the "holocaust" is forbidden from expressing our honest belief on the matter. And it is considered hateful towards jews if one fails to lie regarding the matter.
However, Canada is a country which expresses no interest in equality, so no such comparable laws are set forth to protect Whites from anti-White sentiment. If anyone utters praise for anything good Whites have done for the country or the world at large, they are likely to be met with protests of "White privilege", "colonialism", "non-White people did it first and/or did it better", "Whites deserve no such praise", etc., etc. Condoning, denying or downplaying of White genocide is not condemned as anti-Aryan, and it is not punishable by law in Canada to refer to it as a "conspiracy theory".
On the contrary, government organs of propaganda such as the CBC are in fact doubling down on promoting hatred of Whites. One of the latest trends is for them to enshrine the denial of human racial differences by referring to all non-Whites as "racialized people", and to spell White in only lower-case letters to strengthen the suggestion that it does not signify a race of people, but merely the colour of skin.
The language of propaganda is rife with euphemisms for atrocity, and dysphemisms for positive things. Genocide is whitewashed as "multiculturalism", "decolonization", "immigration", etc.; and White heritage or self-interest is called "supremacy", "prejudice", "bigotry", etc.
The propaganda of genocide is political correctness on steroids. White people are being talked to their extinction, and pressured into talking ourselves into our own extinction.
In this thread, I'd like to present a few terms and whether they are factually appropriate for the use to which we often see them put.
White nationalists are frequently referred to as "White supremacists" by the mainstream media. The term "supremacy" means "the state or condition of being superior to all others in authority, power, or status". The obvious implication of this is they wish ti indict us in the public mind as being suffused with hubris and arrogant pride, as seeing ourselves as inherently better than everyone else.
The fact is that it is healthy and right for ANYONE of ANY race to look upon their own people as being "the best". It has nothing to do with disrespecting or putting down others, and everything to do with being loyal to the life-force to which you owe your very existence. It is comparable to rooting for one's hometown sports team. "Our team is the best!" You don't stop cheering them because some other team from three towns over beat them in this year's playoffs. You continue calling them "the best" because - they're YOUR team. Right or wrong, weak or strong, in good times or bad; you remain faithful to your own.
It is healthy and right for Whites to be so supportive of their race, just as it is right and healthy for the members of every other race to be similarly supportive of their own races. Yet Whites are invariably persecuted for expressing pro-White sentiment, even as members of non-White races are encouraged to celebrate their own cultures and heritage. This anti-White rhetoric is couched in deeply contrived language calculated to make it seem good and right to condemn Whites. The term "supremacist" is one such example, a term calculated to make us seem inherently prejudiced against others if we so much as dare to utter a passing word of praise for anything good our people have done.
Here's another interesting word: "racist". I'll bet you've heard it before!
It just so happens I called myself a "racist" for several years after becoming racially aware. But at some point, I began to develop a certain caution regarding ALL words I use. The caution of being sure to know exactly what a given word means.
Why did I call myself racist? Because I acknowledged the realities of human racial differences, and because I was aware of the pertinence that those racial differences bear in the world. Essentially, I was using the term "racist" to mean "racially aware".
But - surprise! - that's not what the term actually means.
Let's take a look:
QuoteRacist - Oxford dictionary - adjective: characterized by or showing prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism against a person or people on the basis of their membership in a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized.
noun: a person who is prejudiced against or antagonistic toward people on the basis of their membership in a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized.
Delving deeper, from the above definition - "prejudice":
QuotePrejudice - noun: preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience; dislike, hostility, or unjust behavior deriving from unfounded opinions.
That's a lot of baggage packed into that one little word, "racist".
And the fact is that while I am very much racially aware, upon examining the literal meaning of the word "racist", I find that the word simply does not apply to me. I am not "prejudiced"; my racial views are based upon actual experience; I am not driven by dislike nor inclined towards hostility; I am the opposite of unjust in all my endeavours; my opinions are not unfounded. And all this focus on antagonism against others, when I am motivated by a love for my own people and a desire to see them do well?
There's no two ways about it - the term "racist" is completely inappropriate for use upon myself or any serious White nationalist.
And that is a step away from "political correctness" towards literal, factual correctness.
What I am, and for those who would permit me to speak on their behalf, what we are...
We ARE pro-White.
We ARE White nationalists
We ARE NOT White supremacists.
We ARE NOT racists.
These are just a few small examples; I'll be adding more to this thread.