Aryan Guard Forum Rules

[Jotunn]

Don't post anything stupid.

Rules subject to modification as necessary.

[Jotunn]

Here's our first expansion of the forum rules:

•     Don't post anything illegal under Canadian law, or under the law of the country in which you reside.
•     No gratuitous insults of forum members, but respectful criticism is allowed. Be aware that resorting to personal attack is generally an emotional response to perceiving that you may be losing an argument. Try examining your approach to a debate rather than resorting to insult.
•     Don't post claims that anyone is a Jew without proof or evidence.
•     Pointing out inherent differences between men and women is permitted and even encouraged, but do not disparage either sex or treat either sex as the enemy.
•     Likewise, pointing out differences in attitudes among different generations is not forbidden, but do not disparage any generation or treat it as the enemy.
•     In general, avoid any statements that tend to divide White people along any characteristic, including but not limited to sex and generation.
•     Religious discussion is permitted, but please try to avoid proselytizing.
•     Avoid derogatory epithets, racial and otherwise. Name-calling in general is a puerile trait, and not something I want to see proliferate on this forum.

Thank you to Fluxmaster for drafting much of this list of rules.

[Jotunn]

Try keeping news excerpts to the first three paragraphs of the article.

[fluxmaster]

Try keeping news excerpts to the first three paragraphs of the article.

The length of paragraphs can vary wildly depending on the news source. Some news sites make each sentence its own paragraph, whereas with other news sites three paragraphs would be nearly the entire article. Shouldn't we limit the length by the number of words or sentences rather than paragraphs?

[Jotunn]

Try keeping news excerpts to the first three paragraphs of the article.

The length of paragraphs can vary wildly depending on the news source. Some news sites make each sentence its own paragraph, whereas with other news sites three paragraphs would be nearly the entire article. Shouldn't we limit the length by the number of words or sentences rather than paragraphs?

The "sixty word limit" on Stormfront was rather arbitrary and not based on any legal regulation, if I recall correctly. Three paragraphs is generally a good way to get a picture of the story being presented.

[fluxmaster]

Try keeping news excerpts to the first three paragraphs of the article.

The length of paragraphs can vary wildly depending on the news source. Some news sites make each sentence its own paragraph, whereas with other news sites three paragraphs would be nearly the entire article. Shouldn't we limit the length by the number of words or sentences rather than paragraphs?

The "sixty word limit" on Stormfront was rather arbitrary and not based on any legal regulation, if I recall correctly. Three paragraphs is generally a good way to get a picture of the story being presented.

All right, so consider this news article:

Switzerland Votes AGAINST Measure to Stop Mass Immigration by Capping Population — Globalist Bureaucrats Celebrate * The Gateway Pundit * by Ben Kew

Swiss voters narrowly rejected a proposal to cap the country's population at 10 million by 2050, according to preliminary referendum results released Sunday.

With votes counted in 25 of Switzerland's 26 cantons, roughly 54 percent opposed the measure, while 46 percent backed it.

The proposal, put forward by the right-wing Swiss People's Party (SVP), aimed to limit long-term population growth.

The Gateway Pundit style guide calls for each sentence to be its own paragraph. So if I'm posting an article by the Gateway Pundit, I should only be quoting the first three sentences?

[Jotunn]

Sure. Combined with the article title, it's enough for anyone to decide whether they want to click to read more.

Incidentally, those three sentences pass the 60 word mark anyway.